Hadith 40

ek Bin Al-Awr had been at it. Ibn Ziyad-la came consoling and Shareek had been concordant with Muslim Bin Aqeel-ra upon killing Ibn Ziyad-la during his-la present to console Shareek, and his-ra been enabled upon that, and having eased it for him-ra. But he-ra did not do so and excused to Shareek after having lost the opportunity with that assassination, and that the Prophet-saww had said that the Eman is a constrain from the murder. And if Muslim had done the killing of Ibn Ziyad-la what he-ra had enabled from, and Shareek had been concordant upon it to invalidate the matter, and Al-Husayn-asws would have entered Al-Kufa without being repelled from it, and every one would have relaxed his mask in helping him-asws, and the ones in front of him-asws would have gathered to him-asws to help him-asws, and its apparent was with his-asws enemies. And Muslim Bin Aqeel-ra as well, when Ibn Ziyad-la had imprisoned Hany-ra, had travelled to it among a group from the people of Al-Kufa until he-ra presented in his-la castle, and took his-ra restraint, and Ibn Ziyad-la locked the gates besides him-ra fearing and cowardice, until he-la sent the people in every direction making the people desirous and frightening them and making them abandon from helping Ibn Aqeel-asws. So, they sat back, and most of them dispersed until in the evening he-asws was in a small group, and he-ra left and it happened from his-asws matter what transpired. And rather we intended with mentioning this, the summarisation of the causes of the victory of the enemies which took place had various aspects, and that the concordat of the evil is opposite of the matter to what they are reporting, of his-ra patience, and his-asws being surrendered, and scarcity of his-ra helpers upon the return to the rightful religion, or the fervour. A number of them had done that until they were killed in front of him-asws as martyrs, and like of this one should be coveting it, and anticipate in the difficult situations. As for the uniting between his-asws deed and the deed of his-asws brother-asws Al-Hassan-asws, is clear, correct, because his-asws brother-asws had submitted his-asws hand to save from the Fitna and fearing upon himself-asws and his-asws family and his-asws Shias, sensing the betrayal from his-asws companions. And this is what strengthened his-asws thinking of the help from ones having written to him-asws and trusting it, and he-asws saw from the causes of the strength of helpers of the truth, and weakness of the helpers of the falsehood, what had obligated the seeking upon him-asws, and the going out. When that was inverted and the symptoms of betrayal appeared in it, and the evil agreements, he-asws wanted the returning and the refraining and the letting go, like what his-asws brother-asws had done. But he-asws was prevented from that and there was a barrier between him-asws and it. So the two situations are concordant except that the submitting and refraining during the appearance of the symptoms of the fear, they were not acceptable from him-asws, and he-asws did not respond to the promises being made, and demand for himself-asws. He-asws refused from it by rejecting it until he-asws passed away honourably to the Garden of Allah-azwj the Exalted and His-azwj Pleasure. And this is clear for you to ponder’ – end’. I (Majlisi) am saying, ‘There have passed in the book of Imamate and book of ordeals, a lot of Ahadeeth pointing upon that each one of them-asws had been Commanded with special matters written in the heavenly Parchments Revealed unto the Rasool-saww. So, they-asws working with it, and is it not appropriate to compare the rulings relating to them-asws based upon our rulings. And after perusing the situations of the Prophets-as, and that a lot of them-as had been sent along to thousand of Kafirs and they-as were reviling their gods and inviting them to their-as religion, and they-as were not caring what they-as were facing, from the hardships, and the strikes, and the imprisonment, and the killings, and being thrown into the fire, and other than that. It is not appropriate to be raising objections upon the Imams-asws of the religion in the likes of that, along with that is after the affirmation of their-asws being infallible, with the proofs and the consecutive texts. There is no possibility for the objections to be raised upon them-asws. But the submission to them-asws is obligated in all what arrives from them-asws. You, if you were to ponder as is the right o